The Two Towers: Being the Second Part of The Lord of the Rings (The Lord of the Rings, 2)

"The Two Towers," the second book in J.R.R. Tolkien's legendary "The Lord of the Rings" series, is a five-star masterpiece that brilliantly weaves Christian themes into its rich tapestry. This novel isn't just a cornerstone of fantasy literature; it's a profound exploration of good versus evil, redemption, and faith, deeply rooted in Christian symbolism.

Tolkien's narrative skillfully depicts the struggle between light and darkness, a central theme mirroring the Christian fight against sin and for virtue. The resilience of characters like Frodo and Sam in their daunting quest reflects the Christian journey of steadfast faith in the face of trials. Their endurance, against all odds, serves as a poignant allegory for the triumph of good over evil through faith and unwavering resolve.

One of the most compelling aspects of "The Two Towers" is its exploration of redemption, particularly through characters like Gollum. His internal battle between his Sméagol and Gollum personas is a powerful representation of the Christian belief in redemption and the constant struggle between our better selves and our baser instincts. This theme resonates deeply, offering hope and a reminder of the potential for change, regardless of past transgressions.

Additionally, the theme of fellowship, with its emphasis on unity and mutual support, aligns closely with Christian values. The fellowship's journey, though fraught with challenges, highlights the strength found in community and togetherness, a message that is timeless and universally relevant.

In summary, "The Two Towers" is more than a high-fantasy epic. It's a narrative that intertwines adventure with profound spiritual and moral lessons, reflecting core aspects of the Christian faith. For readers seeking a story that combines exhilarating adventure with meaningful spiritual depth, "The Two Towers" is an unparalleled choice.

The first copy of The Two Towers was a print edition belonging to my Grandmother and it's whole title at that time was The Two Towers Being the Second part of The Lord of the Rings and was broken into 2 parts. I don't know exactly know when it became know as it is today as Book 2 of the The Lord of the Rings trilogy. However the change confuses me as I am use to even the Omnibus being presented As J.R.R. Tolkien presented his work as a series.

It Begins right where The Fellowship of The Rings leaves off . As it is one of my favorite series that I read every year. I could accidentally say too much for someone who hasn't yet begun their own journey with The Hobbit There and Back again which I was taught to think of as a prequel. Therefore I won't say a lot only that this details The journey of The Ring forward. By both those on the side of good and ill.

There are new characters introduced in The Two Towers. My favorite of these since childhood is Treebeard of the Ent. My grandmother made me a Treebeard bookmark so I could easily read those pages on my own from about 8 on. While other parts were still a bit daunting for me to read on my own. So we read those together until I was approximately 11. As a dyslexic reading wasn't a automatic love for me. Assigned books weren't really a draw they were a chore. J.R.R. Tolkien work however was different. I wanted to accomplish it so, it's largely why I learned and got through books like Blubber and Ralph and the motorcycle. With the right incentives.

I would highly recommend this book to others, along with rating of higher if I could.

(Warning: Plenty of spoilers ahead)

Another classic tackled. After reading The Fellowship of the Ring, I didn’t think I’d stick with this series despite its indelible mark on the fantasy genre and literature in general. I found The Fellowship unnecessarily long, slow-moving, and incredibly hard to get through. At the end of each chapter, I felt frustrated with how little had happened.

But then, days and weeks after I finished, I kept thinking about the characters and their journey. I stand by my initial critiques — too much world-building (see: way too many names of things and people) + poor pacing (see: the first three chapters — the movie does this better) — but I was still curious about the goings-on of Middle-earth and could begrudgingly admit the journey is the destination, or however that quote goes.

So I ordered The Two Towers, thinking I’d probably do better with a physical copy over an ebook. I can confirm this was the right move. I can also confirm the second book moves along much more quickly than the first with plenty of exciting plot points. That said, I drastically preferred the first half (Book Three) over the second (Book Four). Book Three picks up with the fellowship companions that Frodo and Sam abandoned at the end of The Fellowship of the Ring while Book Four again resumes the journey with Frodo and Sam.

What I’ve come to realize is that I don’t like Frodo. Fair warning, many spoilers ahead.

Hear me out! Literally everyone else is so much more interesting (yeah, yeah, that’s probably the point or something). I know Gandalf is always saying Aragorn is the best tracker ever, but this book really proves it. Aragorn’s like, “See that single broken blade of grass in a huge trampled field? Yeah, the Orcs went that way and they carried two hobbits.” I mean, this guy could actually find a needle in a haystack. And he’s a talented composer of songs and poems alike?! Is there anything he can’t do???

Meanwhile, Legolas and Gimli SHINE. Legolas already served as my primary source of comedic relief with his prancing all over snow mounds and confusion with the slow progress of his group. The bromance between the Elf and Dwarf takes flight, culminating in the battle at Helm’s Deep, where every time they find each other again, they compare kill counts (a little dark, sure) and support one another like no one’s business. And anytime another character’s prejudice keeps them from inviting Gimli to their homes, Legolas is like, “Oh, nuh-uh. I’m not coming without my brave FRIEND, Gimli, for whom I would DIE.” I live for it.

Plus, y’know, Gandalf is resurrected (or never died?) so that’s kind of a big deal. Although he’s still hoarding secrets and off doing who-knows-what most of the time, hand-waving his aliveness away with vague explanations. How can an author be so verbose when describing every hill, hole, and river in any five-mile radius and yet leave the twist of a Wizard’s non-death to the imagination?

So yeah, Book Three — I’m here for it. This is the story I want to read. It’s most interesting when all the different characters are playing off each other. Then we get to Book Four, which has drastically fewer characters and, for the most part, straight traveling. It reminds me of my least favorite parts of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. Honestly, traveling isn’t actually so bad, but we got so much of it in Books One and Two.

Let’s get to the root of my problems. First, I tend to get lost in Tolkien’s long descriptions. Second, I’m so tired of being told that Frodo is kind and pure and perfect. He acts fairly entitled and superior with Sam — who admittedly leans into the servant role — content to boss Sam around, criticize him (see: knot-tying), and never truly listen to his suggestions or concerns. Oddly, Frodo seems to have way more empathy for Smeagol than he does for long-time friend Sam, probably because he wants to look good to Gandalf. Meanwhile, Sam is literally out here sacrificing his life for Frodo but whatevs.

The last two chapters in particular drag. The fight scene with the spider feels drawn out, Frodo’s capture even more so. Why do we have to sit through so much unimportant Orc dialogue just to learn Frodo lives but they’re going to lock him up? I’m ranting now.

I wish Books Three and Four had been combined and the chapters alternated between both groups of characters — that would’ve kept the story moving. And I wish there were more (read: any) prominent female characters. Tolkien can introduce beings and societies like the Ents, but not strong female characters? We even get a quasi-explanation for the lack of female Ents and, y’all, buckle in. The Entwives and Entmaidens are missing. The men left them alone for a bit and now they’re gone. Just gone. Please tell me we pick this thread back up in the next book because what?!

Like, this is an extensive fantasy world and we can have entirely male populations (see: Orcs), but not any entirely non-male groups? I mean, Eowyn is introduced and she even gets to hold a position of power, but she’s there and gone again in the blink of an eye. Fingers-crossed we see her again. I’ll even take Galadriel again in all her beauty = perfection glory.

Sorry, look at me, ranting again. I did actually like this book, I swear! The prose is lyrical and timeless. The included poems and songs hit all the right notes. Boromir’s farewell is heart wrenching, affecting each of the characters in different yet profound ways. And we get to meet Faramir, who I found to be an absolute baller — decisive and intimidating, yet genuine and kind. Standout moments are meeting the Ents, the battle at Helm’s Deep, and Sam’s fumble in the end zone with Faramir. Oh also Smeagol is surprisingly sympathetic? Like I get where Frodo is coming from, but c’mon, just please also send a little of that understanding Sam’s way. He’s way less annoying than Pippin, at the very least!

So if like me, you finished the first book in the series and aren’t sure if you want to keep going, I’d recommend sticking with it! This is a series that only keeps getting better.